The Most Perfect State of Civil Liberty
THESE prohibitions are useful; though it be prudent in their magistrates, and happy for the people, that they are not enforced, and none but the venal or mercenary attempt to enforce them. The law in this case, like an indulgent parent, still keeps the rod, though the child is seldom corrected. Were those pardoned offences to rise into enormity, were they likely to obstruct the happiness of society, or endanger the state, it is then that justice would resume her terrors, and punish those faults she had so often overlooked with indulgence. It is to this ductility of the laws, that an Englishman owes the freedom he enjoys superior to others in a more popular government.
Every popular government seems calculated to last only for a time; it grows rigid with age, new laws are multiplying, and the old continue in force; the subjects are oppressed, burthened with a multiplicity of legal injunctions; there are none from whom to expect redress, and nothing but a strong convulsion in the state can vindicate them into former liberty.*
* ‘Popular’ here is not used in the sense of ‘widely liked’ but in the sense of a government in which the general public, as opposed to a closed political class, plays a dominant role in making policy. Goldsmith was one of a number of English political writers who welcomed a degree of popular government as a brake on the Crown, but feared the consequences of too much. Another Irishman, William Lecky (1838-1903), foresaw a day when a deluded public might even vote for a dictator, which Germany did in 1933. See Democracy in Europe.